[Spce-user] Cable modem reinvite NAT issue.
Kelemen Árpád
arpad.kelemen at g-online.hu
Tue Nov 8 10:23:23 EST 2011
Hi All,
In the rtp.log I find the following:
Nov 8 16:03:23 sip mediaproxy-ng: Got valid command from
udp:127.0.0.1:52252: 2150_8 US f4ba5995ce2e6352 78.131.7.9 16454
2AB9DEFD-4EB94424000EFC17-7935A700;1 8c23134673;1
Nov 8 16:03:23 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Opened ports
30012/30013 for RTP
Nov 8 16:03:23 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Opened ports
30014/30015 for RTP
Nov 8 16:03:23 sip mediaproxy-ng: Got valid command from
udp:127.0.0.1:52252: 2150_9 US f4ba5995ce2e6352 78.131.7.9 0
2AB9DEFD-4EB94424000EFC17-7935A700;2 8c23134673;2
Nov 8 16:03:23 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Opened ports
30016/30017 for RTP
Nov 8 16:03:23 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Opened ports
30018/30019 for RTP
Nov 8 16:03:23 sip mediaproxy-ng: Got valid command from
udp:127.0.0.1:58801: 2160_8 LS f4ba5995ce2e6352 10.31.1.2 53456
2AB9DEFD-4EB94424000EFC17-7935A700;1 8c23134673;1
Nov 8 16:03:23 sip mediaproxy-ng: Got valid command from
udp:127.0.0.1:58801: 2160_9 LS f4ba5995ce2e6352 10.31.1.2 53456
2AB9DEFD-4EB94424000EFC17-7935A700;2 8c23134673;2
Nov 8 16:03:23 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Confirmed peer
information - 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:03:25 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Confirmed peer
information - 78.131.7.9:16454
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: Got valid command from
udp:127.0.0.1:60565: 2168_8 US f4ba5995ce2e6352 78.131.7.9 16454
2AB9DEFD-4EB94424000EFC17-7935A700;1 8c23134673;1
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Opened ports
30020/30021 for RTP
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Opened ports
30022/30023 for RTP
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Re-using existing
open RTP ports
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: Got valid command from
udp:127.0.0.1:60565: 2168_9 US f4ba5995ce2e6352 78.131.7.9 0
2AB9DEFD-4EB94424000EFC17-7935A700;2 8c23134673;2
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Opened ports
30024/30025 for RTP
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Opened ports
30026/30027 for RTP
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 78.131.7.9:16454
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Confirmed peer
information - 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: Got valid command from
udp:127.0.0.1:52252: 2150_10 LS f4ba5995ce2e6352 10.31.1.2 53456
2AB9DEFD-4EB94424000EFC17-7935A700;1 8c23134673;1
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Re-using existing
open RTP ports
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: Got valid command from
udp:127.0.0.1:52252: 2150_11 LS f4ba5995ce2e6352 10.31.1.2 53456
2AB9DEFD-4EB94424000EFC17-7935A700;2 8c23134673;2
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Re-using existing
open RTP ports
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] Confirmed peer
information - 78.131.7.9:16454
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53457
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
Nov 8 16:05:53 sip mediaproxy-ng: [f4ba5995ce2e6352] RTP packet
discarded from 10.31.1.2:53456
On 11/7/2011 5:00 PM, Stefan Sayer wrote:
>
> o � on 11/07/2011 04:36 PM:
>> Dear Jonathan,
>>
>> I already cross the mentioned posting but unfortunately my issue is just
>> one way. In case if the call is between subscribers or the call come
>> from
>> PSTN all work perfectly.
>>
>> The following log is get from the modem (debug mode). You will see the
>> INVITE at 13:23:08.610 11/04/2011 "Failed to update call trace info" and
>> the BEY at 13:23:19.200 11/04/2011
>
> from the log doesn't look like it's got anything to do with session
> timers or reinvite if the cable modem is sending BYE after just over
> 10 seconds. Do you at all get RTP to the cable modem in such a call?
>
> Stefan
--
----------------------------------------------------
Kelemen Árpád
G-Online Kft
1193 Budapest
Víztorony u. 20
----------------------------------------------------
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in
this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in
this message (or responsible for delivery of the message
to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message
to anyone. In such a case, you should destroy this
message and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail.
More information about the Spce-user
mailing list