[Spce-user] 403 and ROUTE_FILTER_FAILOVER

Andreas Granig agranig at sipwise.com
Mon Dec 10 04:49:55 EST 2012


On 12/07/2012 04:07 PM, Matthew Ogden wrote:
> Perhaps not just a spce question… but Is there any reason not to use
> With code 403 (forbidden?)
> Just out of interest, wondering if anyone can see if that is a silly idea?

Well, it depends on which circumstances you get a 403 back (e.g. from
one of your peering providers). If you want to do fail-over based on
this code, it could make sense for you to add it to this filter route in
your customtt.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 899 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20121210/118419f1/attachment-0001.asc>

More information about the Spce-user mailing list