[Spce-user] Initial Loose-Routing Forbidden

[John Murray]

Thanks,

The Route header points to a slightly different domain which I have now
added and this works.

The provider has 2 gateways so perhaps the route header is to define which
one is used.

We have holiday until Wednesday in the UK so I will check with them then.

Best regards
John


-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Pogrebennyk [mailto:apogrebennyk at sipwise.com] 
Sent: 04 June 2012 10:29
To: Klaus Darilion
Cc: John Murray; spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
Subject: Re: [Spce-user] Initial Loose-Routing Forbidden

Hi!

On 06/04/2012 11:11 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Probably your clients send out-of-dialog requests with Route headers.
> 
> Regarding SPCE: Wouldn't it be more reliable to just ignore and remove 
> Route headers on incoming out-of-dialog requests?

That's what we do when Route header on incoming out-of-dialog requests
points to one of our domains, i.e.:

	if(loose_route())
	{
		...
		if(!has_totag())
		{
			if($du != $null && is_domain_local("$dd"))
			{
				xlog("L_INFO", "Reset initial local route -
M=$rm R=$ru F=$fu T=$tu
IP=$avp(s:ip):$avp(s:port) ($si:$sp) ID=$ci\n");
				$du = $null;
			}
	...

If the initial Route header points to somewhere else we reject it, for
security reasons I believe.

John, could you check with the peer why it's sending Route in initial
INVITE?

BR,
Andrew