[Spce-user] peering rules priority

[Matthew Ogden]

On the web gui, is it a typo (2.5) that it says "caller pattern", should it
say callee pattern?



Or does callee prefix accept patterns?



See this screenshot (sorry for text readers)



> -----Original Message-----

> From: Jon Bonilla (Manwe) [mailto:jbonilla at sipwise.com]

> Sent: 08 November 2012 06:14 PM

> To: spce-user at lists.sipwise.com

> Cc: Matthew Ogden

> Subject: Re: [Spce-user] peering rules priority

>

> El Thu, 8 Nov 2012 17:56:27 +0200

> Matthew Ogden <matthew at tenacit.net> escribió:

>

> > Thanks Jon,

> >

> > I thought of making 27 for the server that should have priority, but

> > then I realised, how would I catch all other calls for all other

> > countries, to also use this peer, as I don’t want to use my seconday

> > peer for anything but load balancing on particular numbers.

> >

> > Is there any other prefix I can use that is more important than blank,

> > but still catches everything?

> >

>

> Please, remember to answer to the list.

>

>

> You could use "callee pattern" instead of "callee preffix" to match
"^[1-9]".

> That would match everything with length of 1 while blank matches

> everything with length 0

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20121108/5a15f388/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7580 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20121108/5a15f388/attachment-0001.png>