[Spce-user] Under attack :-(

Matthew Ogden matthew at tenacit.net
Fri Feb 15 03:49:45 EST 2013


Hi,



Read this thread:
http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user/2012-May/001357.html



You need to send a 200 OK, and then they usually stop. Then ban them.



Regards



*From:* spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com [mailto:
spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com] *On Behalf Of *Theo
*Sent:* 15 February 2013 10:45 AM
*To:* spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
*Subject:* [Spce-user] Under attack :-(



Hi



ngrep-sip gives me:



#

U 2013/02/15 10:39:23.432811 173.242.123.148:5266 -> 196.41.123.113:5060

REGISTER sip:196.41.123.113 SIP/2.0'

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.242.123.148:5266;branch=z9hG4bK-2478367181;rport'

Content-Length: 0'

From: "12unknown" <sip:12unknown at 196.41.123.113>'

Accept: application/sdp'

User-Agent: friendly-scanner'

To: "12unknown" <sip:12unknown at 196.41.123.113>'

Contact: sip:123 at 1.1.1.1'

CSeq: 1 REGISTER'

Call-ID: 4123206054'

Max-Forwards: 70'

'

with a script changing the Call-ID a a massive rate. So someone is trying
to register or doing something sinister. This box is not behind a firewall
at this point, just a test box. the IP you see there 173.242.123.148 has
indeed been added to the banned IPs which I guess means nothing is actually
reaching the proxy? Do we just leave it like this until they give up or is
there some other action I should take?



There is no monetary risk at this point for us - this is really just for
testing and all details such as IPs are going to change if and when we
would start using it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20130215/1602d0e0/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spce-user mailing list