[Spce-user] Problem with SIP Peering and Billing

[Daniel Grotti]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

If the peering group has the same peering rules and same priority spce
should send traffic out 50% to peer1 and 50% to peer2.

Daniel


On 07/26/2013 01:39 PM, Jon Bonilla (Manwe) wrote:
> El Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:18:42 +0300 Ali Jawad
> <ali.jawad at splendor.net> escribió:
> 
>> Dear Sirs
>> 
>> I do have two different billing profile sets one for each of my
>> carriers, after that I setup SIP PEERING Groups and Peering
>> servers. The problem I do have is that I want to send my traffic
>> 50% to Carrier A and 50% to Carrier B, I could do that easily in
>> one Peering Server group but in that case both would have the
>> same billing profile.
>> 
>> If I choose two different billing profiles ->sip peering groups
>> -> peering servers with carrier IPs. Then the billing is correct
>> but calls to one breakout for example 0091 always goes to the
>> first define sip peering group.
>> 
>> Is this a limitation by design or have I missed something here ?
> 
> 
> I'd say it's by design.
> 
> Do you have the same peering rules on both peering groups? Do both
> peering groups have the same priority?
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ Spce-user mailing
> list Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com 
> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR8mDfAAoJEJPC7K/l6VLL59kH/jsCU6NErFDI7p21YZ2aIrPQ
lpW4w7vMHWq/3l5TrRg4xjjSlvHtixdtWyWeQQRxfW3oAwzU3J0b1lDmEnevI/et
mgvpMSPRAhybiNa+4EXJpRRRhu5d/x4lHX8DyLX/5BVqMXvoO3FME23TQVSHkPrx
rKktObEORs3R+m4Xy6a+3DJUbf+lWJFXjv1wpsMNYu6wxhRYHSjMsF/3x+4qGvEr
bve2RucvpgRqUxi2tRFsfaP4HPZRTf6kJJmqZJAxc07UFcshwdhi2PmTLo2npB5B
PyW6C18/likAHNADwNlSdFv4X4M3nBNmCt/SOAsCq6vljAPM9dFOiWAX9HkATHk=
=MkDZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----