[Spce-user] Problem with SIP Peering and Billing

[Ali Jawad]

All is the same on both billing groups and sub groups ..the only difference
is in the billing amounts and the IPs of the 1 carrier gw in each group.
Traffic always goes to first defined group.


On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Daniel Grotti <dgrotti at sipwise.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> If the peering group has the same peering rules and same priority spce
> should send traffic out 50% to peer1 and 50% to peer2.
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On 07/26/2013 01:39 PM, Jon Bonilla (Manwe) wrote:
> > El Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:18:42 +0300 Ali Jawad
> > <ali.jawad at splendor.net> escribió:
> >
> >> Dear Sirs
> >>
> >> I do have two different billing profile sets one for each of my
> >> carriers, after that I setup SIP PEERING Groups and Peering
> >> servers. The problem I do have is that I want to send my traffic
> >> 50% to Carrier A and 50% to Carrier B, I could do that easily in
> >> one Peering Server group but in that case both would have the
> >> same billing profile.
> >>
> >> If I choose two different billing profiles ->sip peering groups
> >> -> peering servers with carrier IPs. Then the billing is correct
> >> but calls to one breakout for example 0091 always goes to the
> >> first define sip peering group.
> >>
> >> Is this a limitation by design or have I missed something here ?
> >
> >
> > I'd say it's by design.
> >
> > Do you have the same peering rules on both peering groups? Do both
> > peering groups have the same priority?
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________ Spce-user mailing
> > list Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> > http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR8mDfAAoJEJPC7K/l6VLL59kH/jsCU6NErFDI7p21YZ2aIrPQ
> lpW4w7vMHWq/3l5TrRg4xjjSlvHtixdtWyWeQQRxfW3oAwzU3J0b1lDmEnevI/et
> mgvpMSPRAhybiNa+4EXJpRRRhu5d/x4lHX8DyLX/5BVqMXvoO3FME23TQVSHkPrx
> rKktObEORs3R+m4Xy6a+3DJUbf+lWJFXjv1wpsMNYu6wxhRYHSjMsF/3x+4qGvEr
> bve2RucvpgRqUxi2tRFsfaP4HPZRTf6kJJmqZJAxc07UFcshwdhi2PmTLo2npB5B
> PyW6C18/likAHNADwNlSdFv4X4M3nBNmCt/SOAsCq6vljAPM9dFOiWAX9HkATHk=
> =MkDZ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spce-user mailing list
> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>



-- 
*Ali Jawad
*
*Information Systems Manager
CISSP - PMP - ITIL V3 - RHCE - VCP - C|EH - CCNA - MCSA
*
*Splendor Telecom (www.splendor.net)
Beirut, Lebanon
Phone: +9611373725/ext 116
FAX: +9611375554

*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20130726/c36c1914/attachment-0001.html>