[Spce-user] peering rules priority

[Matthew Ogden]

Now,

How to make one get twice as much traffic as the other for a set numbers of
same prefix length?
Just add another group with the same peer IP and prefixes?



On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Jon Bonilla <jbonilla at sipwise.com> wrote:

> El Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:13:49 +0200
> Matthew Ogden <matthew at tenacit.net> escribió:
>
> > How would I achieve this:
> >
> >
> >
> > I have 3 peers, (currently as 3 separate peer groups)
> >
> >
> >
> > For certain number prefixes, I would like equal load balancing if
> possible.
> >
> >
> >
> > For everything else, I want them in a specific order of priority.
> >
>
> The gw selection priority is like this:
>
> - First match length
> - Second group priority
> - Third gw weight
>
> So for balancing between you 3 groupd you could have same match length,
> priority and weight in all three nodes.
>
> For others where you want strict priority you can add the preffixes with
> different match lenght if possible. An idea would be to use callee pattern.
> something like this (example spain):
>
> ^34
> ^34[0-9]
> ^34[0-9][0-9]
>
> There's another option if this is not possible but requires kamailio's lcr
> module patching. I've just tested it in my last week's training in Madrid
> and
> maybe could fit:
>
> - Make gws not unique between peer groups
> - Make gw weight behave as priority
> - Make group priority third option, after gw weight
>
> I could provide you with the patch if the default solution does not fit
> your
> needs.
>
>
> cheers,
>
> Jon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spce-user mailing list
> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/mailman/private/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20130307/4913bbaa/attachment.html>