[Spce-user] 483 Too Many Hops
Lorenzo Mangani
lorenzo.mangani at gmail.com
Sun Mar 24 12:25:03 EDT 2013
Hi Marc,
As you can see from your trace, the call is never completely established,
as the 200 OK's ACK never makes it back to the user-agent.
After a brief look this seems to be caused by the gateway always using the
contact header to respond instead of the from header, as for the BYE
message also being rejected for the same reason - just my 2 cents, might be
wrong - maybe someone else on the list will have different input,
Best,
Lorenzo Mangani
HOMER DEV TEAM
QXIP - Network Engineering
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Marc Rys <m.rys at tri-lakes.net> wrote:
> ok I'll stop changing the subject, even though I regret not naming it SPCE
> Taqua Integration..
>
> Anyways, I've heeded your advice and I normalized the patterns and I'm now
> routing the calls from my Taqua PSTN gateway to my IP phones. Now the
> newest problem to reveal itself is the incoming calls to my Phones fail to
> setup completely. It appears all the call routing is working properly now,
> I can call my DID from the PSTN, and my IP phone rings, but when I pickup
> the call, I hear no audio, and it appears the phone never completely sets
> up the call. The screen still shows the phone as ringing.
>
> The wireshark cap shows RTP moving between my gateway & SPCE, and RTP
> moving between SPCE and my IP phone, but the call never appears to setup
> completely on the IP phone.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Marc Rys
> http://www.tri-lakes.net
> http://www.rystec.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lorenzo Mangani" <lorenzo.mangani at gmail.com>
> To: "Marc Rys" <m.rys at tri-lakes.net>
> Cc: spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 4:39:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [Spce-user] 483 Too Many Hops
>
> Marc,
>
>
> Please don't fork the messages by creating a new thread for each step of
> the discussion and consult the documentation.
> You need an inbound rewrite rule applied to strip the + from the INVITE in
> order to match the local user, as well described in the Handbook, actually
> this is exactly the example shown there:
> http://www.sipwise.com/doc/2.7/spce/ar01s06.html#dialplans
>
>
>
> Lorenzo Mangani
>
>
>
> HOMER DEV TEAM
> QXIP - Network Engineering
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Lorenzo Mangani <
> lorenzo.mangani at gmail.com > wrote:
>
>
> Marc,
>
>
> Your Tarqua invite has Max-Forwards set to 1.
> Try increasing the allowed hops and the call will terminate.
>
>
>
>
>
> Lorenzo Mangani
>
>
>
> HOMER DEV TEAM
> QXIP - Network Engineering
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Marc Rys < m.rys at tri-lakes.net > wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I've been evaluating SPCE over the last week. I've already setup a couple
> test subscribers and setup a peer with a provider we work with for SIP LD
> Term. All of those test have worked very successful.
>
> We also have our own media gateway which is interconnected with the local
> PSTN via TDM trunk, but I send incoming calls from the PSTN through our
> MediaGateway to SPCE, SPCE is responding back with 483 "Too Many Hops".
> Attached is the wireshark cap.
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Marc Rys
> http://www.tri-lakes.net
> http://www.rystec.com
> _______________________________________________
> Spce-user mailing list
> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spce-user mailing list
> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>
>
--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20130324/20afc139/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Spce-user
mailing list