[Spce-user] Peer to peer transit calls - CDRs not properly mediated/rated?

[gavin.sweet@skyracktelecom.com]

<Nudge>

Any thoughts on why carrier rating might not work as expected...?

Thanks,
Gavin

----- Reply message -----
From: "Gavin Sweet" <gavin.sweet at skyracktelecom.com>
To: <spce-user at lists.sipwise.com>
Subject: [Spce-user] Peer to peer transit calls - CDRs not properly mediated/rated?
Date: Fri, Jan 31, 2014 17:34

Hi all -  We’ve been running Sipwise for a long time now with no problems generating correct CDR records for subscriber calls (applying billing profiles etc). We have recently started operating in a transit type model for some peers and are having a problem with CDRs for peer to peer transit calls. Calls generate CDR records but they do not contain the expected/correct data in the cost and zone fields, they come out as:  '0.00','0.00','onnet','','platform internal','',  E.g.(anonymised):'1002396','2014-01-31 15:56:44','0','2','','','','0','02391111111','xxx.yyy.zzz.195','442391111111','0','','0','7','','','','','0','aaa.bbb.ccc.25','441152222222','109.239.110.182','','','call','ok','200','2014-01-31 15:51:02.864','2014-01-31 15:51:07.780','331.830','35585-3600172261-853630 at MSX28.foobar.com','ok','2014-01-31 15:56:44','0.00','0.00','onnet','','platform internal','','01152222222','0','0' These peering contracts are all setup using exactly the same billing profile as that used for the carrier profile in the subscriber calls that do work properly, so I cant see that it is a problem with the profile. For instance the destination fee profile that should match the above is configured as  ^4411[5].{7}$  which works everywhere else for such a call. Any one seen a similar problem? CheersGavin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20140204/d206750f/attachment.html>