[Spce-user] Fwd: Re: Blacklist t.38 fax codec

Leopoldo Iglesia liglesia at por-aire.es
Mon Jun 23 07:39:02 EDT 2014


Seems to be resolved, with that mod con config template.

Thanks Daniel-

El 20/06/2014 14:24, Daniel Grotti escribió:
> Could be,
> as I see also the normal t38 negotiation is client-dependent....it
>
> But from RFC3261:
>
>  During the session, either Alice or Bob may decide to change the
>    characteristics of the media session.  This is accomplished by
>    sending a re-INVITE containing a new media description.  This re-
>    INVITE references the existing dialog so that the other party knows
>    that it is to modify an existing session instead of establishing a
>    new session.  The other party sends a 200 (OK) to accept the change.
>    The requestor responds to the 200 (OK) with an ACK.  If the other
>    party does not accept the change, he sends an error response such as
>    488 (Not Acceptable Here), which also receives an ACK. However, the
>    failure of the re-INVITE does not cause the existing call to fail -
>    the session continues using the previously negotiated
>    characteristics.
>
>
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
>
> On 06/20/2014 02:08 PM, Matthew Ogden wrote:
>>
>> I think the problem is, a 488 will stop the call altogether?
>>
>> I cant recall, but if you get a 488 in a REINVITE, will the call not 
>> terminate after that, or does it "failback" to leaving t38 
>> un-negotiated... might be device dependent?
>>
>> *From:*spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com 
>> <mailto:spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com> 
>> [mailto:spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com 
>> <mailto:spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com>] *On Behalf Of *Leopoldo 
>> Iglesia
>> *Sent:* 20 June 2014 01:55 PM
>> *To:* spce-user at lists.sipwise.com <mailto:spce-user at lists.sipwise.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Spce-user] Fwd: Re: Blacklist t.38 fax codec
>>
>> Ok. "has_totag" where is located ??
>>
>> El 20/06/2014 13:35, Daniel Grotti escribió:
>>
>>     I have nothing ready to give you right now.
>>     Basically on kamailio proxy you should match a Re-invite (using
>>     the "has_totag") and check if SDP contains t38 headers/codec
>>     (just have a look how the T38 reinvite looks like).
>>     So, if you receive a re-invite with T38 headers into SDP, just
>>     send back a 488 reply.
>>
>>     Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     On 06/20/2014 01:28 PM, Leopoldo Iglesia wrote:
>>
>>         Fine, how can I do this hack? cause endpoints is impossible
>>         to mod config, so they are rented and provisioned by an ftth
>>         operator.
>>
>>         El 20/06/2014 13:23, Daniel Grotti escribió:
>>
>>             Hi,
>>             I think you need to avoid to forward the T38 Re-INVITE,
>>             so you should hack your SPCE in order to reply to the T38
>>             re-invite with a "488 Not acceptable here", for example.
>>             So the sender SHOULD fallback to G711.
>>             Anyway, the best solution if you have endpoint with t38
>>             enabled but they don't work well, is to disable t38.
>>
>>
>>             Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>>             On 06/20/2014 01:15 PM, Leopoldo Iglesia wrote:
>>
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>                 	
>>
>>
>>                 > But both endpoints support it, that is the problem
>>                 and the only > scenario when it fails, so i want SPCE
>>                 not to send Fax negotiation to > endpoint,.
>>
>>
>>
>>                  El 20/06/2014 12:12, Daniel Grotti escribió: >> Hi,
>>                 >> that's strange, if one of the endpoints try to
>>                 switch to t38 and the >> other endpoint doesn't
>>                 support it, they should fallback to G711. >> >>
>>                 Daniel >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 06/20/2014 01:33 AM,
>>                 Leopoldo Iglesia wrote: >>> How can I, blacklist t.38
>>                 to avoid endpoints to try t38 negotiation? >>> >>>
>>                 When i call from ericcson ont to fax capable
>>                 endpoint, it try to >>> connect t38 fax and There is
>>                 no voice. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Leopoldo iglesia >>>
>>                 >>> _______________________________________________
>>                 >>> Spce-user mailing list >>>
>>                 Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>                 <mailto:Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com> >>>
>>                 http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user >> >>
>>                 _______________________________________________ >>
>>                 Spce-user mailing list >> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>                 <mailto:Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com> >>
>>                 http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user > >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                 _______________________________________________
>>
>>                 Spce-user mailing list
>>
>>                 Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com  <mailto:Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com>
>>
>>                 http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>
>>             Spce-user mailing list
>>
>>             Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com  <mailto:Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com>
>>
>>             http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>
>>         Spce-user mailing list
>>
>>         Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com  <mailto:Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com>
>>
>>         http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>
>>     Spce-user mailing list
>>
>>     Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com  <mailto:Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com>
>>
>>     http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spce-user mailing list
>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spce-user mailing list
> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20140623/d09e69b5/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spce-user mailing list