[Spce-user] packet growth on t.38 reinvites

Matthew Ogden matthew at tenacit.net
Mon Aug 24 09:15:19 EDT 2015


Ok,

So back on thread:

Does removing the use agent have any other side affects?

I also wondered, it seems spce branch values are much larger than my peers
are, and since its adding via 3 legs and record-routes, its quite a lot. Is
it necessary that are are generated so uniquely on a given day?

Is using TCP the preferred option? I thought UDP was preferred.


Kind Regards

On 24 August 2015 at 14:28, Jon Bonilla (Manwe) <manwe at sipdoc.net> wrote:

> El Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:15:46 +0200
> Matthew Ogden <matthew at tenacit.net> escribió:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The problem is not the SDP but the SIP headers. It's quite difficult to
> make
> them shorter but we have 3 options here:
>
> - Remove some extra headers like user-agent and try to make udp packer
> shorter.
>   This should be just edit sems configuration. It's easy but maybe not
> enough
> - Force customers to use TCP
> - Put sems or some kind of SBC between customers and ngcp to do topoh
> hiding
>   and keep SIP small (it would remove some Via and Route headers and it
> would
>   keep SIP small)
>
>
> cheers,
>
> Jon
>
>
>
>
>


-- 





*Matthew Ogden*

Management

TenacIT





*Strategic IT Consulting *•* Advanced Networking *• *Virtualisation*

*Custom Development *• *Hosting *• *Syspro Support  *• *MS Licensing*

National Tel: 041 10 10 100 | Cell: 084 205 4445 | Email:
matthew at tenacit.net

CT Tel: 021 201 0333 | Skype Name: matthew.ogden | Web:
http://www.tenacit.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20150824/b1cf677a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spce-user mailing list