[Spce-user] SIP UDP packet fragmentation breaking calls
Marco Teixeira
admin at marcoteixeira.com
Tue Sep 22 10:14:24 EDT 2015
Nice !
Thankx
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Daniel Grotti <dgrotti at sipwise.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> we already have it on our roadmap (internal ticket MT#0009327)
> I already noticed that not-fully-compliant point to rfc.
> We will provide a solution for that in the future, cannot say why though.
>
>
> --
> Daniel Grotti
> VoIP Engineer
>
>
> Sipwise GmbH
> Europaring F15 | 2345 Brunn am Gebirge, Austria | www.sipwise.com
>
> On 09/22/2015 04:04 PM, Marco Teixeira wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Thank you for your reply.
> > Please consider getting it onto your roadmap to keep your amazing
> > product RFC compliant.
> >
> > For clarity here is the link i forgot to past (i guess)
> > https://support.software.dell.com/kb/sw10958
> >
> > ---
> > Best regards
> > Marco
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Grotti <dgrotti at sipwise.com
> > <mailto:dgrotti at sipwise.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Marco,
> > SPCE does not fallback in TCP unfortunately.
> > you should reduce the MTU by removing headers or you should be able
> to
> > rebuild your fragmented packets at the final destination.
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Grotti
> > VoIP Engineer
> >
> >
> > Sipwise GmbH
> > Europaring F15 | 2345 Brunn am Gebirge, Austria | www.sipwise.com
> > <http://www.sipwise.com>
> >
> > On 09/21/2015 11:27 PM, Marco Teixeira wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > I might have stumbled upon the issue described here (but without
> > any ALG
> > > in the middle, just for example, as i can't pass any sensitive
> > info here)
> > >
> > > I'm seeing fragmented SIP packets when the final gateway sends
> OPTION
> > > back over 2 NGCP CE and over to a final farm of SIP servers...
> > >
> > > The call is established correctly and only when the OPTIONs don't
> get
> > > ACK, the call drops within 10 seconds (always).
> > >
> > > So, according to the test on that link, trancript below:
> > > (..) If a request is within 200 bytes of the path MTU, or if it is
> > larger
> > > than 1300 bytes and the path MTU is unknown, the request MUST
> > be sent
> > > using an RFC 2914 [43] congestion controlled transport
> > protocol, such
> > > as TCP. (...)
> > >
> > > Shouldn't SIPWISE activate TCP or whatever to avoid this ?
> > > How did you guys solve this ?
> > > (no, TCP on all calls is really asking for trouble on the call
> volume
> > > i'm aimming for)
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Marco
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Spce-user mailing list
> > > Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com <mailto:Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com>
> > > https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spce-user mailing list
> > Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com <mailto:Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com>
> > https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20150922/76520b55/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Spce-user
mailing list