[Spce-user] RTPEngine ICE Candidates Exchange
Richard Fuchs
rfuchs at sipwise.com
Sat Jan 9 19:50:00 EST 2016
On 09/01/16 10:18 AM, Peter Villeneuve wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Could you please take a look at my post above and confirm whether this
> is a bug or is intended behaviour?
> I'm going to recompile rtpengine changing the "host" in line 105 to
> "relay" to see how the linphone clients behave in that scenario, but
> that's going to take some time and I'd rather not waste any precious
> time if I'm barking up the wrong tree.
What you probably want is to pass the ICE=force-relay option to
rtpengine instead of ICE=force. However that option is currently not
supported from within the NGCP framework. As an easy fix, you can try
patching proxy.cfg.tt2 to replace ICE=force with ICE=force-relay.
I'm curious though why Linphone would be confused by additional host
candidates but not additional relay candidates.
Cheers
More information about the Spce-user
mailing list