[Spce-user] SIP Peering Server Priority

[Matthias Hohl]

Hello again,

is there any way to edit this, that the weight will not use the %..? 
I want to group the peering servers from one provider and not create for every server a own peering group.
Best would be if: is the weight higher, then every call from this peering group goes to this server. If call fail, the next second weightest peering server of this group will be used.

Would be cool if there is any solution for define failovers inside a peering group.

Any idea?

Thanks

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Spce-user [mailto:spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com] Im Auftrag von Jon Bonilla (Manwe)
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Mai 2016 17:35
An: spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
Betreff: Re: [Spce-user] SIP Peering Server Priority

El Mon, 16 May 2016 17:19:36 +0200 (CEST) Matthias Hohl <matthias.hohl at telematica.at> escribió:

> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> i created a Peering Group with the Peering Rule to accept all calls there.
> 
> Inside this peering group a created 2 peering server.
> 
>  
> 
> One (Server A) with weight 10 and one (Server B) with weight 20.
> 
> Booth are activated.
> 
>  
> 
> I want that every outgoing call goes over Server B cause the weight 
> ist 20 but this doesn't work reliable.
> 
> Some calls also goes over Server A outside, even if Server B is not 
> used by any other call.
> 
> If I check kamailio-proxy.log I also see, that the server used Server 
> A from beginning and never tried Server B first.
> 
>  
> 
> So don't know, but this setting is not so reliable like I thought it 
> would function.
> 

As long as you put the servers under the same peer group both will receive the calls. the weigh will control de % of call per server.

If you want to send all to gw1 and gw2 as failover put them under 2 different peering groups with different match or different priority.


cheers,

Jon