[Spce-user] Under what scenario could sipwise silently drop an invite?

[Abel Alejandro]

Well, the network capture is a network application that runs on the same
sipwise server, its from the voipmonitor.org guys, I dont see how the
network sniffer could capture the data and at the same time the server not
deliver it to the kamalio process.

I sent you the pcap capture privately, but yes the domain looks correct. Is
there no chance the endpoint was banned during this time? Would that skip
the logs?


On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Daniel Grotti <dgrotti at sipwise.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> Well if no request are on Kamailio-lb, then invites never reached the
> server.
> Are you sure the invite was heading to the right sip domain?
>
> Daniel
> On May 27, 2016 8:51 PM, Abel Alejandro <
> aalejandro at alliedtechnologygrouppr.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am testing a voipmonitor and just saw an interesting call where an
> endpoint sent to sipwise 3 invites and it never got answered. Mind you I am
> doing the voipmonitor capture at the sipwise server itself so there is no
> chance of network packet loss here.
>
> When I take a look at the logs I dont even see the request
> in kamailio-lb.log or kamailio-proxy.log , is there any other place I could
> check?
>
>
>
> --
> *Abel Alejandro*
>
> 787 586 8313 | 787 705 0555
> <joquendo at alliedtechnologygrouppr.com>
>
> 400 Calle Calaf 477
> San Juan, PR 00918
> aalejandro at alliedtechnologygrouppr.com
>
>


-- 
*Abel Alejandro*

787 586 8313 | 787 705 0555
<joquendo at alliedtechnologygrouppr.com>

400 Calle Calaf 477
San Juan, PR 00918
aalejandro at alliedtechnologygrouppr.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20160527/4dc80987/attachment-0001.html>