[Spce-user] Selective NAT pinging switch off possible?

[Barry Flanagan]

On 24 April 2017 at 08:09, Walter Klomp <walter at myrepublic.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the hint - works like a charm.
>

Great!


>
> As 99% of the subscribers don’t need it, I have switched it off in the
> domain and it seems to be working, but how do I enable it now for every
> subscriber that DO need it?
>
> there is no “enable” function, or do I disable ping and then un-disable
> ping ?
>
>
Yeah, I think you would need to have it on at domain and selectively turn
it off - there is no way to do it the other way around as far as I am aware.

-Barry


> Thanks
> Walter
>
>
>
>
> On 17 Apr 2017, at 3:03 PM, Barry Flanagan <barry at flanagan.ie> wrote:
>
> On 17 Apr 2017 06:07, "Walter Klomp" <walter at myrepublic.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I did that, doesn’t have an effect… subscriber still gets the OPTION ping
> sent every specified interval...
>
> Anything else i need to do, or does it only take effect in the next
> registration interval?
>
>
> Yes I think it would on next register.
>
> -Barry
>
>
> Walter
>
>
> On 15 Apr 2017, at 6:15 PM, Barry Flanagan <barry at flanagan.ie> wrote:
>
> On 15 Apr 2017 05:36, "Walter Klomp" <walter at myrepublic.net> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Happy Easter!
>
> How can I switch off NAT pinging to destinations that do not need it?
>
>
> Hi
>
> Under Subscribers Preferences -> NAT & Media Flow Control,
> set no_nat_sipping
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> -Barry Flanagan
>
> I see nat pinging to every address 192.168.x and 10.x.x.x and
> 172.16-31.x.x … is this hard-coded? Shouldn’t it be only done to addresses
> where the "contact" domain address is different from the "received" IP
> address the request comes from?
>
> Kamailio has a function in the pinger module for this (where the flag to
> omit pinging is specified in location table) but it doesn’t seem to be
> there in SPCE.
>
> We have 10.x.x.x addresses on our network to our ONT equipment which
> doesn’t require NAT (as it’s directly connected)… If we could switch off
> NAT pinging to these addresses that would probably save a lot of resources
> on the NAT pinger as per my calculation we wouldn’t be able to exceed 96k
> subscribers on an SPCE installation, regardless on how much power and speed
> we give the machine this runs on.
>
> Are there other “hard” limits on an SPCE platform that would prevent
> subscriber growth, other than perhaps concurrent calls ?
>
> Thanks
> Walter.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spce-user mailing list
> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20170424/13d39e04/attachment-0001.html>