[Spce-user] Upstream sends Bye instead of cancel

[qabane me]

Hi

The carrier in question is not very helpful and while we are still trying
to get them to change this, for the moment they are refusing, citing:

AS per RFC 5407 ( The caller MAY send a BYE in the Early state, even
though this behavior is not recommended. A BYE sent in the Early state
terminates the early dialog using a specific To tag)

This is causing phones to keep on ringing upon the bye. If they really will
not change their behaviour, how do I change ours so that we don't have that
issue?


On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 4:46 PM qabane me <qabaneitsolutions at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Daniel!
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 4:16 PM Daniel Grotti <dgrotti at sipwise.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> in general chapter 15 of RF3261, here an extract:
>>
>>
>> "The notion of "hanging up" is not well defined within SIP.  It is
>>        specific to a particular, albeit common, user interface.
>>        Typically, when the user hangs up, it indicates a desire to
>>        terminate the attempt to establish a session, and to terminate any
>>        sessions already created.  For the caller's UA, this would imply a
>>        CANCEL request if the initial INVITE has not generated a final
>>        response, and a BYE to all confirmed dialogs after a final
>>        response.  For the callee's UA, it would typically imply a BYE;
>>        presumably, when the user picked up the phone, a 2xx was
>>        generated, and so hanging up would result in a BYE after the ACK
>>        is received."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Daniel Grotti
>>
>> Head of Customer Support                     Sipwise GmbH
>> e: dgrotti at sipwise.com                     Europaring F15
>> t: +43(0)130120332                A-2345 Brunn Am Gebirge
>> w: www.sipwise.com   FN: 305595f   FG: LG Wiener Neustadt
>>
>> On 5/10/19 3:34 PM, qabane me wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > On of our interconnects sends calls to us. When the caller cancels the
>> > call before a session is established, they send us a BYE. That should
>> be
>> > a CANCEL as far as I know. This is causing issues with the callee's
>> > phone continuing to ring. I am trying to argue with them but they are
>> > saying it's allowed. I am trying to check the RFCs but am not finding
>> > ammunition. Does any one have a link to show that indeed I am right and
>> > they are wrong? (assuming that I am)
>> >
>> > So the scenario is:
>> > image.png
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Spce-user mailing list
>> > Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>> > https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spce-user mailing list
>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20190514/55f10289/attachment-0001.html>