[Spce-user] Allow: missing in header for 180 Ringing

[Jon Bonilla (Manwe)]

El Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:07:09 +0200
Jon Bonilla (Manwe) <jbonilla at sipwise.com> escribió:

> 
> Could you please give us more info about the peer and why those requirements?
> I need to refresh the rfcs regarding provisional responses but don't think
> that's correct.
> 


Please check rfc3261, section 20 tables 2 and 3

Those headers are mandatory in 2XX responses (to INVITE request). No required
in provisional responses AFAICS.