[Spce-user] Network Configuration

[Matthew Ogden]

One other option of course would be to have 2 SPCE's running?

Allow your router to route packets between SPCE #1 and SPCE #2, but SPCE
#2 is on same L2 connection to special provider. Assuming you can use 2
IPs on the private L2 side.

Then SPCE #2 can keep its L2 connection, and can still use your route for
getting out of that L2 connection to elsewhere (back to SPCE#1).

Complicated I'd say! But multiple RTP proxies involves more knowledge than
the above networking knowledge.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Pogrebennyk [mailto:apogrebennyk at sipwise.com]
> Sent: 18 April 2013 03:06 PM
> To: Deon Vermeulen
> Cc: Matthew Ogden; spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> Subject: Re: [Spce-user] Network Configuration
>
> Hi Deon,
> well, as Matthew has suggested you should look into extra_sockets
option.
> There have been some example on the mailing lists before as well. You
don't
> need to modify the kamailio configs or templates.
>
> But there is one drawback that may be critical for you: extra_sockets
work
> only for signaling. The mediaproxy can listen only on one address at a
time
> for RTP. It would be much better for you to perform the configuration on
> your router. Otherwise you would need to develop something like Thilo
has
> posted. Or try to make 3 "sets" of mediaproxy but you have to be very
> comfortable with sip (just an idea, most certainly doesn't work as you
> would need different kernel tables).
>
> BR,
> Andrew
>
> On 04/18/2013 01:23 PM, Deon Vermeulen wrote:
> > Hi Matthew
> >
> > One of the providers specifically require a L2 connectivity and on a
> > specific port.
> >
> > Kamailio can listen on different IP:port.
> >
> > /etc/kamailio/proxy/kamailio.cfg
> >
> > # internal interfaces
> > listen=udp:127.0.0.1:5062
> > listen=tcp:127.0.0.1:5062
> >
> > I don't want to hard "code" the listening interfaces and ports there
> > as I'm not sure what effect it will have when setting up the peers and
> > what effect " ngcpcfg apply " will have on future configuration
> > changes and or future updates.
> >
> >
> > Thanks again for any assistance/guidance
> >
> >
> > Kind Regards
> > Deon
> >> Matthew Ogden <mailto:matthew at tenacit.net> April 18, 2013 12:14
> PM
> >>
> >> Hi Deon,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Why must each carrier use a different network. (It is not supported
> >> by SPCE as it stands anyhow as far as I know).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Rather setup gateway firewall if they need to be split down different
> >> physical connections. (Cisco, Juniper, actual linux firewall etc)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *From:*spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com
> >> <mailto:spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com>
> >> [mailto:spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com
> >> <mailto:spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com>] *On Behalf Of *Deon
> >> Vermeulen
> >> *Sent:* 18 April 2013 12:58 PM
> >> *To:* spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> >> <mailto:spce-user at lists.sipwise.com>
> >> *Subject:* [Spce-user] Network Configuration
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Can anyone please help me to achieve the following network
> configuration:
> >>
> >>
PROVIDER 2
> >>
|
> >>
|
> >>                                                                  SIP
TRUNK
> >>
|
> >>
|
> >> Internal Network  ---- SIP TRUNK  -----   SPCE   ----- SIP TRUNK
-----
> >> PROVIDER 1
> >>
|
> >>
|
> >>                                                                  SIP
TRUNK
> >>
|
> >>
|
> >>
> >> PROVIDER 3
> >>
> >>
> >> Network Addresses and Listening Ports:
> >>
> >> Internal Network
> >> - Eth0
> >>       ip: 192.168.0.10
> >>       netmask: 255.255.255.0
> >>       port: 5060
> >>       protocol: udp
> >>       rtp_ext
> >>       web_int
> >>       web_ext
> >>
> >> PROVIDER 1
> >> - Eth1
> >>       ip: 172.16.1.10
> >>       netmask: 255.255.255.0
> >>       port: 6080
> >>       protocol: udp
> >>       rtp_ext
> >>
> >> PROVIDER 2
> >> - Eth2
> >>       ip: 172.16.2.10
> >>       netmask: 255.255.255.0
> >>       port: 6085
> >>       protocol: udp
> >>       rtp_ext:
> >>
> >> PROVIDER 3
> >> - Eth3
> >>       ip: 172.16.3.10
> >>       netmask: 255.255.255.0
> >>       port: 6090
> >>       protocol: udp
> >>       rtp_ext
> >>
> >>
> >> OBJECTIVES:
> >> 1. All services should be available on the Internal Network.
> >> 2. Only SIP and RTP services should be available on the PROVIDER
> networks.
> >> 3. Only the assigned SIP Ports should be available to the respective
> >> PROVIDER, ie. PROVIDER 1 only port 6080 udp.
> >> 4. I'm not sure how the roles should be setup for each respective
> >> interface?
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot.
> >>
> >> Kind Regards
> >>
> >> Deon
> >>
> >> Deon Vermeulen <mailto:vermeulen.deon at gmail.com> April 18, 2013
> 11:58
> >> AM Hi
> >>
> >> Can anyone please help me to achieve the following network
> configuration:
> >>
> >>
PROVIDER 2
> >>
|
> >>
|
> >>                                                                  SIP
TRUNK
> >>
|
> >>
|
> >> Internal Network  ---- SIP TRUNK  -----   SPCE   ----- SIP TRUNK
-----
> >> PROVIDER 1
> >>
|
> >>
|
> >>                                                                  SIP
TRUNK
> >>
|
> >>
|
> >>
> >> PROVIDER 3
> >>
> >>
> >> Network Addresses and Listening Ports:
> >>
> >> Internal Network
> >> - Eth0
> >>       ip: 192.168.0.10
> >>       netmask: 255.255.255.0
> >>       port: 5060
> >>       protocol: udp
> >>       rtp_ext
> >>       web_int
> >>       web_ext
> >>
> >> PROVIDER 1
> >> - Eth1
> >>       ip: 172.16.1.10
> >>       netmask: 255.255.255.0
> >>       port: 6080
> >>       protocol: udp
> >>       rtp_ext
> >>
> >> PROVIDER 2
> >> - Eth2
> >>       ip: 172.16.2.10
> >>       netmask: 255.255.255.0
> >>       port: 6085
> >>       protocol: udp
> >>       rtp_ext:
> >>
> >> PROVIDER 3
> >> - Eth3
> >>       ip: 172.16.3.10
> >>       netmask: 255.255.255.0
> >>       port: 6090
> >>       protocol: udp
> >>       rtp_ext
> >>
> >>
> >> OBJECTIVES:
> >> 1. All services should be available on the Internal Network.
> >> 2. Only SIP and RTP services should be available on the PROVIDER
> networks.
> >> 3. Only the assigned SIP Ports should be available to the respective
> >> PROVIDER, ie. PROVIDER 1 only port 6080 udp.
> >> 4. I'm not sure how the roles should be setup for each respective
> >> interface?
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot.
> >>
> >> Kind Regards
> >>
> >> Deon
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spce-user mailing list
> > Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> > http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
> >