[Spce-user] Intro

Mon May 6 08:56:02 EDT 2013

"The NGCP will however allow inbound calls from the servers in this group even without peering rules."

I created no Peering Rules for my Vitelity inbound group because this said SipWise accepts inbound calls.

There are no Rewrite Rules.

-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremie Chism" <jchism2 at gmail.com>
To: "Mike Hammett" <sipwise at ics-il.net>
Cc: spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 7:34:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Spce-user] Intro

It's a rewrite rule. What is happening is what vitality is sending you is not matching up. I have a rewrite rule for vitality I can send you. Also did you do the accept all rule for your vitality peer. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 6, 2013, at 7:01 AM, Mike Hammett <sipwise at ics-il.net> wrote:

> =====
> A call to your DID 815981XXXX  from 815739XXXX has failed at 5:48am on 05/06/2013 MDT. We received 'CONGESTION'  when attempting to route the call to your server or device. This number is configured to route to the peer 65.182.XXX.XXX.
> 
> This error usually means your server or device does not recognize the number being dialed. If using asterisk, make sure you have the correct inbound context specified on your inbound trunk and that you have correctly added an inbound route/extension logic for this DID.
> =====
> 
> So apparently whatever I did is wrong.
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Hammett" <sipwise at ics-il.net>
> To: spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 6:23:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [Spce-user] Intro
> 
> I did see where to change to IP based authentication and did so. Why is IP authentication preferred over user authentication? Well, other than it is more complicated to do this with SIPWise.
> 
> I haven't tested it yet, but I made two peer groups, one for inbound and one for outbound. I didn't create any peering rules for the inbound group.
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin Masse" <kmasse at questblue.com>
> To: "Skyler" <skchopperguy at gmail.com>, spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 6:08:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [Spce-user] Intro
> 
> Good morning, I noticed something that needs to be addressed when using Vitelity.
> 
>>>> Proxy:        sip28.vitelity.net (66.241.99.27)
>>>> Outbound Proxy:        outbound.vitelity.net
> 
> Not all accounts with Vitelity will use the same inbound and outbound settings.
> Vitelity may send you traffic from any of the following
> 64.2.142.0/24
> 66.241.99.0/24
> 
> If you are using settings provided by another Vitelity user it may not be the same as yours.  Make sure you know what your provisioned for with Vitelity and use those settings.
> 
> Additionally it is not suggested to use registration with providers. If you can avoid it, use IP Authentication.  In the Vitelity portal go to the support link, then click on sub accounts. You will be able to setup your IP there for IP Authentication.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kevin
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com [mailto:spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com] On Behalf Of Skyler
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 4:14 AM
> To: spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> Subject: Re: [Spce-user] Intro
> 
> Woops, apparently I need sleep. sry.
> 
> On 5/5/2013 9:53 PM, Skyler wrote:
>> Jeremie,
>> 
>>  Do you also have user/pass on your vitality peer?
>> 
>>  "I'm not sure how I'm supposed to put this into Sipwise."
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 5/5/2013 6:10 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>>> You enter the information into sip peers. I use vitality as one of my 
>>> upstreams. I think we have 5 or so now. If you use the accept all 
>>> rule for the peer it will allow any call to come in. Rewrite rules 
>>> are used to normalize incoming calls to e164 format. A rewrite rule 
>>> can be used for many things. Ex. If you want to use *98 for voicemail 
>>> instead of the default 2000 a rewrite rule will do that. The users 
>>> manual is pretty detailed for peers. The only thing you may need help 
>>> for is the rewrite rules.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On May 5, 2013, at 7:35 PM, Mike Hammett <sipwise at ics-il.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Little of the peering section makes sense to me. One of my upstreams 
>>>> has given me the following information:
>>>> 
>>>> Proxy:        sip28.vitelity.net (66.241.99.27)
>>>> Outbound Proxy:        outbound.vitelity.net
>>>> Login:        XXXXXXXXXX
>>>> Password:        XXXXXXXXXX
>>>> 
>>>> I'm not sure how I'm supposed to put this into Sipwise. I want to be 
>>>> able to receive calls from this provider as well as send them calls.
>>>> As I add more providers, I want to be able to receive calls from 
>>>> them and send my outbound to them.
>>>> 
>>>> I see there was a lot of attention paid to the Rewrite Rule Set 
>>>> section, of which I'm not sure why you even need that. Just have a 
>>>> check box on each client (Force outbound caller-ID to DID). Done, or 
>>>> not.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>> 
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Jon Bonilla" <jbonilla at sipwise.com>
>>>> To: spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 5:10:06 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Spce-user] Intro
>>>> 
>>>> El Sun, 28 Apr 2013 16:38:02 -0500 (CDT) sipwise at ics-il.net 
>>>> escribió:
>>>> 
>>>>> I'm just setting it up now. I've used Asterisk (pre-1.2 aka flat 
>>>>> files, no gui help) and a few Asterisk based systems over the 
>>>>> years, so I at least have the basics of VoIP down. The install was 
>>>>> much more pleasant than PBX in a Flash. That asks a million 
>>>>> unnecessary questions and takes forever.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thus far my commentary on the setup is thorough, but very confusing.
>>>>> Very
>>>>> little of the terminology used makes sense to me. I am forging 
>>>>> ahead through the setup, but I'm not sure what I'm doing or how the 
>>>>> pieces fit together.
>>>>> Maybe I'll understand better once it's running, but for now...  I'm 
>>>>> lost.
>>>> 
>>>> Well, the installation process is quite unattended as you've seen.
>>>> The Handbook
>>>> gives you an overview of what you have but also a quick start guide.
>>>> Follow it
>>>> and try to understand the terms behind it. Don't try to think in 
>>>> "pbx" terms because the spce is not a pbx or an asterisk system.
>>>> 
>>>> Ask here when you get stucked. And you can always ask for a personal 
>>>> training/webinar to our sales team. We're organizing trainings in 
>>>> several countries too.
>>>> 
>>>> cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> Jon
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Spce-user mailing list
>>>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>>> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Spce-user mailing list
>>>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>>> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Spce-user mailing list
>>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spce-user mailing list
> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
> _______________________________________________
> Spce-user mailing list
> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spce-user mailing list
> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spce-user mailing list
> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user