[Spce-user] Intro

Jeremie Chism jchism2 at gmail.com
Mon May 6 10:30:13 EDT 2013


Ill put all the ones in there that I have. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 6, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Andreas Granig <agranig at sipwise.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
> 
> There is a wiki page we started long ago to collect various peering provider examples, however there is only one there yet:
> 
> http://sipwise.com/doc/wiki/doku.php?id=spce:peering
> 
> Probably you could add your settings there? That would be awesome!
> 
> Thanks,
> Andreas
> 
> On 05/06/2013 03:00 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>> You are correct. The peering rule is for outbound only. I will send you
>> my vitality rewrite rules.
>> 
>> On Monday, May 6, 2013, Mike Hammett wrote:
>> 
>>    "The NGCP will however allow inbound calls from the servers in this
>>    group even without peering rules."
>> 
>>    I created no Peering Rules for my Vitelity inbound group because
>>    this said SipWise accepts inbound calls.
>> 
>>    There are no Rewrite Rules.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    -----
>>    Mike Hammett
>>    Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>    http://www.ics-il.com
>> 
>>    ----- Original Message -----
>>    From: "Jeremie Chism" <jchism2 at gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>>    To: "Mike Hammett" <sipwise at ics-il.net <javascript:;>>
>>    Cc: spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>    Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 7:34:23 AM
>>    Subject: Re: [Spce-user] Intro
>> 
>>    It's a rewrite rule. What is happening is what vitality is sending
>>    you is not matching up. I have a rewrite rule for vitality I can
>>    send you. Also did you do the accept all rule for your vitality peer.
>> 
>>    Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>    On May 6, 2013, at 7:01 AM, Mike Hammett <sipwise at ics-il.net> wrote:
>> 
>>     > =====
>>     > A call to your DID 815981XXXX  from 815739XXXX has failed at
>>    5:48am on 05/06/2013 MDT. We received 'CONGESTION'  when attempting
>>    to route the call to your server or device. This number is
>>    configured to route to the peer 65.182.XXX.XXX.
>>     >
>>     > This error usually means your server or device does not recognize
>>    the number being dialed. If using asterisk, make sure you have the
>>    correct inbound context specified on your inbound trunk and that you
>>    have correctly added an inbound route/extension logic for this DID.
>>     > =====
>>     >
>>     > So apparently whatever I did is wrong.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > -----
>>     > Mike Hammett
>>     > Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>     > http://www.ics-il.com
>>     >
>>     > ----- Original Message -----
>>     > From: "Mike Hammett" <sipwise at ics-il.net>
>>     > To: spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>     > Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 6:23:41 AM
>>     > Subject: Re: [Spce-user] Intro
>>     >
>>     > I did see where to change to IP based authentication and did so.
>>    Why is IP authentication preferred over user authentication? Well,
>>    other than it is more complicated to do this with SIPWise.
>>     >
>>     > I haven't tested it yet, but I made two peer groups, one for
>>    inbound and one for outbound. I didn't create any peering rules for
>>    the inbound group.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > -----
>>     > Mike Hammett
>>     > Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>     > http://www.ics-il.com
>>     >
>>     > ----- Original Message -----
>>     > From: "Kevin Masse" <kmasse at questblue.com>
>>     > To: "Skyler" <skchopperguy at gmail.com>, spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>     > Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 6:08:15 AM
>>     > Subject: Re: [Spce-user] Intro
>>     >
>>     > Good morning, I noticed something that needs to be addressed when
>>    using Vitelity.
>>     >
>>     >>>> Proxy: sip28.vitelity.net <http://sip28.vitelity.net>
>>    (66.241.99.27)
>>     >>>> Outbound Proxy: outbound.vitelity.net
>>    <http://outbound.vitelity.net>
>>     >
>>     > Not all accounts with Vitelity will use the same inbound and
>>    outbound settings.
>>     > Vitelity may send you traffic from any of the following
>>     > 64.2.142.0/24 <http://64.2.142.0/24>
>>     > 66.241.99.0/24 <http://66.241.99.0/24>
>>     >
>>     > If you are using settings provided by another Vitelity user it
>>    may not be the same as yours.  Make sure you know what your
>>    provisioned for with Vitelity and use those settings.
>>     >
>>     > Additionally it is not suggested to use registration with
>>    providers. If you can avoid it, use IP Authentication.  In the
>>    Vitelity portal go to the support link, then click on sub accounts.
>>    You will be able to setup your IP there for IP Authentication.
>>     >
>>     > Thanks,
>>     > Kevin
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > -----Original Message-----
>>     > From: spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com
>>    [mailto:spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com] On Behalf Of Skyler
>>     > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 4:14 AM
>>     > To: spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>     > Subject: Re: [Spce-user] Intro
>>     >
>>     > Woops, apparently I need sleep. sry.
>>     >
>>     > On 5/5/2013 9:53 PM, Skyler wrote:
>>     >> Jeremie,
>>     >>
>>     >>  Do you also have user/pass on your vitality peer?
>>     >>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Jeremie Chism
>> Triton Communications
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spce-user mailing list
>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spce-user mailing list
> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> http://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user




More information about the Spce-user mailing list