[Spce-user] Peer to peer transit calls - CDRs not properly mediated/rated?

Gavin Sweet gavin.sweet at skyracktelecom.com
Fri Jan 31 12:34:21 EST 2014


Hi all - 

 

We've been running Sipwise for a long time now with no problems generating
correct CDR records for subscriber calls (applying billing profiles etc).

 

We have recently started operating in a transit type model for some peers
and are having a problem with CDRs for peer to peer transit calls.

 

Calls generate CDR records but they do not contain the expected/correct data
in the cost and zone fields, they come out as:
'0.00','0.00','onnet','','platform internal','', 

 

E.g.(anonymised):

'1002396','2014-01-31
15:56:44','0','2','','','','0','02391111111','xxx.yyy.zzz.195','442391111111
','0','','0','7','','','','','0','aaa.bbb.ccc.25','441152222222','109.239.11
0.182','','','call','ok','200','2014-01-31 15:51:02.864','2014-01-31
15:51:07.780','331.830','35585-3600172261-853630 at MSX28.foobar.com','ok','201
4-01-31 15:56:44','0.00','0.00','onnet','','platform
internal','','01152222222','0','0'

 

These peering contracts are all setup using exactly the same billing profile
as that used for the carrier profile in the subscriber calls that do work
properly, so I cant see that it is a problem with the profile.

 

For instance the destination fee profile that should match the above is
configured as  ^4411[5].{7}$  which works everywhere else for such a call.

 

Any one seen a similar problem?

 

Cheers

Gavin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/mailman/private/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20140131/e8e50df5/attachment.html>


More information about the Spce-user mailing list