[Spce-user] No rewrite on T.38 INVITE

Tristan Delsol tdelsol at qfast.nl
Wed Aug 26 09:03:55 EDT 2015


Hi Daniel,

I'm hoping you're not fed up with this one. I did a debug on the proxy 
for this and I noticed that for some reason the proxy reads the Callee 
as "0". But I'm not sure why. I'm not really familiar with the debug 
log.
I hope you can find some spare time to have a look anyways.
On line 959 you can see the "No matching rewrite rules for '0' found".

Thanks,
Tristan

On 2015-08-25 17:13, Tristan Delsol wrote:
> I asked them a couple of days back, but it's not possible. They are
> flexible as most big telco's are.
> I will try and sell them the idea that I will use a separate analog
> line for faxing then or something.
> Not sure what else to try anymore.
> 
> Tristan
> 
> On 25-08-15 16:43, Daniel Grotti wrote:
>> Can you disable t38 in such a broken device ?
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Daniel Grotti
>> VoIP Engineer
>> 
>> 
>> Sipwise GmbH
>> Europaring F15 | 2345 Brunn am Gebirge, Austria | www.sipwise.com
>> 
>> On 08/25/2015 04:40 PM, Tristan Delsol wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>> 
>>> If I send a 488 back it tries another re-invite with just g711 but 
>>> then
>>> I get the 404 not found also. So that one is not working.
>>> Does spce check the request-uri? If so, then I can understand the 404
>>> because of the weird request-uri.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 25-08-15 16:35, Daniel Grotti wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> how is that possible ?
>>>> Did you add a section in LB like ?
>>>> 
>>>> if(is_method("INVITE") && uri =~ "^sip:ngcp-lb;tgrp.+@")
>>>> {
>>>>       sl_send_reply("488", "Not acceptable");
>>>>       exit;
>>>> }
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Grotti
>>>> VoIP Engineer
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Sipwise GmbH
>>>> Europaring F15 | 2345 Brunn am Gebirge, Austria | www.sipwise.com
>>>> 
>>>> On 08/25/2015 04:32 PM, Tristan Delsol wrote:
>>>>> Just to be sure I reinstalled the whole box and configured it as 
>>>>> basic
>>>>> as possible, but unfortunately still getting the 404 not found on 
>>>>> the
>>>>> re-invite.
>>>>> Is there anything else I can try?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tristan
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 24-08-15 11:55, Tristan Delsol wrote:
>>>>>> I tried the 488 from LB, but if I do that I still get the same 404 
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> found. So I send the 488, the telco ACKs it and then sends a new 
>>>>>> INVITE
>>>>>> without T.38 but the same happens with this INVITE, which is the 
>>>>>> 404
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> found.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have a trace of that one also if you want.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 24-08-15 11:40, Daniel Grotti wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> something wrong in your rewriting patch, cause proxy receives:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Call from PSTN -
>>>>>>> R=sip:ngcp-lb at 87.239.101.193:5060;ngcpct=7369703a3132372e302e302e313a35303830
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ID=1183523204412000183319 at 192.168.111.25_b2b-1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I would suggest to do not rewrite, but just reject the re-invite 
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> 488 on LB if the RURI has that format.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Daniel Grotti
>>>>>>> VoIP Engineer
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sipwise GmbH
>>>>>>> Europaring F15 | 2345 Brunn am Gebirge, Austria | www.sipwise.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 08/24/2015 11:12 AM, Tristan Delsol wrote:
>>>>>>>> No problem. Attached.
>>>>>>>> And thanks for the help.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Tristan
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 24-08-15 11:09, Daniel Grotti wrote:
>>>>>>>>> would help to see LB an PROXY log.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Daniel Grotti
>>>>>>>>> VoIP Engineer
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Sipwise GmbH
>>>>>>>>> Europaring F15 | 2345 Brunn am Gebirge, Austria | 
>>>>>>>>> www.sipwise.com
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 08/24/2015 10:35 AM, Tristan Delsol wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Daniel,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I have no clue :)
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Here the re-invite before I rewrite the request-uri and the 
>>>>>>>>>> 404
>>>>>>>>>> response:
>>>>>>>>>> INVITE
>>>>>>>>>> sip:ngcp-lb;tgrp=9752;trunk-context=ipic.imscore.net at 87.239.101.193:5060;ngcpct=7369703a3132372e302e302e313a35303830
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>> 139.156.126.49:5060;branch=z9hG4bKfofomd006o71lno6s1i0.1
>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 585966869312000201754 at 192.168.111.25_b2b-1
>>>>>>>>>> From:
>>>>>>>>>> <sip:+31306665648 at ims.imscore.net>;tag=SDemtl399-127.0.0.1alUtKGp-09752+1+a3000095+156d2c30
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> To:
>>>>>>>>>> <sip:+31756418049 at 192.168.111.25>;tag=3D534336-55D9A6A9000B9F71-7E3B2700
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 98894742 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:+31306665648 at 139.156.126.49:5060;transport=udp>
>>>>>>>>>> Min-SE: 90
>>>>>>>>>> Session-Expires: 7200;refresher=uac
>>>>>>>>>> Supported: replaces, path, 100rel, timer
>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 276
>>>>>>>>>> Allow: INVITE, BYE, REGISTER, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, SUBSCRIBE,
>>>>>>>>>> NOTIFY,
>>>>>>>>>> PRACK, INFO, REFER, UPDATE, PUBLISH, MESSAGE
>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Alcatel-Lucent 5060 MGC-8 9.2.0.4.0.11
>>>>>>>>>> Route:
>>>>>>>>>> <sip:87.239.101.193;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=3D534336-55D9A6A9000B9F71-7E3B2700;ngcplb=yes>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Route:
>>>>>>>>>> <sip:127.0.0.1;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=3D534336-55D9A6A9000B9F71-7E3B2700;ngcplb=yes>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>>> o=- 3649316138 3649316139 IN IP4 139.156.126.49
>>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 139.156.126.49
>>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>>> m=image 23680 udptl t38
>>>>>>>>>> a=T38FaxVersion:0
>>>>>>>>>> a=T38MaxBitRate:14400
>>>>>>>>>> a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF
>>>>>>>>>> a=T38FaxMaxBuffer:72
>>>>>>>>>> a=T38FaxMaxDatagram:316
>>>>>>>>>> a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> SIP/2.0 404 Not Found
>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>> 139.156.126.49:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKfofomd006o71lno6s1i0.1
>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 585966869312000201754 at 192.168.111.25_b2b-1
>>>>>>>>>> From:
>>>>>>>>>> <sip:+31306665648 at ims.imscore.net>;tag=SDemtl399-127.0.0.1alUtKGp-09752+1+a3000095+156d2c30
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> To:
>>>>>>>>>> <sip:+31756418049 at 192.168.111.25>;tag=3D534336-55D9A6A9000B9F71-7E3B2700
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 98894742 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>> Server: Sipwise NGCP Proxy 3.X
>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Tristan
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 24-08-15 09:08, Daniel Grotti wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>> how can you receive a 404 on a re-invite ?
>>>>>>>>>>> Does the re-invite have the From-tag and To-tag ?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Grotti
>>>>>>>>>>> VoIP Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Sipwise GmbH
>>>>>>>>>>> Europaring F15 | 2345 Brunn am Gebirge, Austria | 
>>>>>>>>>>> www.sipwise.com
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/24/2015 12:23 AM, Tristan Delsol wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Checked a lot of things but I'm still getting a 404 not 
>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>> spce.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I managed to change the request-uri from
>>>>>>>>>>>> sip:ngcp-lb;tgrp=9752;trunk-context=ipic.imscore.net at 87.239.101.193:5060;ngcpct=7369703a3132372e302e302e313a35303830
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> sip:ngcp-lb at 87.239.101.193:5060;ngcpct=7369703a3132372e302e302e313a35303830,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> but I'm still getting a 404 not found.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Shouldn't this work?
>>>>>>>>>>>> I mean the spce is sending this as Contact.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tristan
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-08-21 14:25, Daniel Grotti wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes something like:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if(is_method("INVITE") && uri =~ "^sip:ngcp-lb;tgrp.+@")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Grotti
>>>>>>>>>>>>> VoIP Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sipwise GmbH
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Europaring F15 | 2345 Brunn am Gebirge, Austria |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.sipwise.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/20/2015 07:44 PM, Tristan Delsol wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only problem is actually that the telco sends this 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weird
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the following request-uri:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sip:ngcp-lb;tgrp=9752;trunk-context=ipic.imscore.net at 87.239.101.193:5060;ngcpct=7369703a3132372e302e302e313a35303830
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I could maybe rewrite this to remove the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ";tgrp=9752;trunk-context=ipic.imscore.net" or send a 488
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could I add something to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /etc/ngcp-config/templates/etc/kamailio/proxy/proxy.cfg.customtt.tt2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if(is_method("INVITE") &&
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> search("tgrp=9752;trunk-context=ipic.imscore.net"))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         sl_send_reply("488", "Not Acceptable Here");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         exit;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tristan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-08-20 16:15, Tristan Delsol wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The reason is that the interconnect with our telco is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tripping
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our contact-header of ngcplb@<ip> only with T.38, because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-invite.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They hide behind the fact that they have a spec for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interconnect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that only wants phonenumber@<ip>or<dns> in the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact-header.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20-08-15 16:05, Daniel Grotti wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any reason for that ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The callee should reply 488, not the server.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, I remember some old threasd about that:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user/2014-June/006788.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this could help.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Grotti
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VoIP Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sipwise GmbH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Europaring F15 | 2345 Brunn am Gebirge, Austria |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.sipwise.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/20/2015 03:41 PM, Tristan Delsol wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Back again on this :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One more thing. Would it be possible to disable T.38 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somehow. So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that if the RE-INVITE comes in that we send back a 488?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or maybe I can set it up for certain subscriber 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> numbers?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tristan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17-08-15 17:01, Tristan Delsol wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the info. I will experiment with that to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then I will check if we would really want that or not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tristan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17-08-15 16:58, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/17/2015 03:39 PM, Tristan Delsol wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They state that they don't support that format for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> header.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They have it in the specs for the interconnect that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> header
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can only contain the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sip:+«ISN»@«ip-address/URL»:«port» with optional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user=”phone”, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sip:+31703434343 at domain.net:5060;user=”phone”.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ISN: International Subscriber Number
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> port: UDP portnumber;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> URL: Uniform Resource Locator: domain name;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible I can adjust the contact header for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to keep the format as needed?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately this is not something you can easily
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> achieve,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have some understanding of kamailio config scripts 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modify
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /etc/ngcp-config/templates/etc/kamailio/lb/kamailio.cfg.tt2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and disable the Contact masking completely, e.g.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calls
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of ROUTE_MASK_CONTACT and ROUTE_UNMASK_CONTACT as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> starting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then each side will receive the internal IP of b2b as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sip:127.0.0.1:5080, which exposes your topology a bit 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outside
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still doesn't break the protocol. But we are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sending the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number part
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which might be a problem for them (they didn't say 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is optional). Sorry I can't help you out more at this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spce-user mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spce-user mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spce-user mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spce-user mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spce-user mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spce-user mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Spce-user mailing list
>>>>>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>>>>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Spce-user mailing list
>>>>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>>>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Spce-user mailing list
>>>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Spce-user mailing list
>>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spce-user mailing list
>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spce-user mailing list
> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kamailio-proxy.log.tar.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 76701 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20150826/3bfc1267/attachment-0001.gz>


More information about the Spce-user mailing list