[Spce-user] sip fragmentation

Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana rabs at dimension-virtual.com
Wed Apr 13 19:11:29 EDT 2016


Trust me ... it's not a fragmentation problem ... just follow the indications on the documentation about the "Audiocodes devices workaround", the real problem it's the 1.27.0.0.1 IP on the RR headers ... VoIPStunt and a lot of other SIP-Carriers, doesn't support private IP's on the SIP headers. 

> De: "Jonathan Yue" <jonathan.yue at turboitsolutions.com>
> Para: "Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana" <rabs at dimension-virtual.com>,
> spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> Enviados: Miércoles, 13 de Abril 2016 23:09:45
> Asunto: Re[2]: [Spce-user] sip fragmentation

> Thanks for your input Raúl.
> in the packet captures, I notice following items:
> INVITE sip:1xxxxxxxxxx at sip.voipstunt.com SIP/2.0
> Record-Route:
> <sip:x.x.x.115;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=3F30077D-570BCE0A000B61B3-54909700;ngcplb=yes>
> Record-Route:
> <sip:127.0.0.1;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=3F30077D-570BCE0A000B61B3-54909700;ngcplb=yes>
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.115;branch=z9hG4bK037e.d0ff913568a8906a194cc8f2492a77c7.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 127.0.0.1:5080;received=127.0.0.1;branch=z9hG4bKsdiM4aEk;rport=5080
> I wonder if the 2nd record-route message and 2nd Via message are necessary. If
> they are omitted, the sip packet won't be fragmented.
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana" < rabs at dimension-virtual.com >
> To: spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> Sent: 2016-04-13 1:02:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [Spce-user] sip fragmentation

>> You could activate header compresion, but you will have to pray to VoIPStunt to
>> support that.

>> Better check why your headers get so big

>>> De: "Jonathan Yue" < jonathan.yue at turboitsolutions.com >
>>> Para: spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>> Enviados: Martes, 12 de Abril 2016 23:48:43
>>> Asunto: [Spce-user] sip fragmentation

>>> Hi, gang,
>>> Is there a way to shrink the header of sip message sent from spce? I configured
>>> a sip trunk with VoIPStunt as a test. After receiving invite message, VoIPStunt
>>> sends 401, spce then sends out an sdp, supposedly containing authentication
>>> digest, however, the message gets fragmented. VoIPStung never responds again,
>>> apparently it doesn't assemble fragmented packets.
>>> I then change the trunk's transport protocol to tcp, VoIPStunt doesn't respond
>>> at all, I guess it doesn't support tcp.
>>> spce version is v4.2.1. in the attached screenshot, 77.72.169.129 is VoIPStunt's
>>> ip address, the other is my spce's.
>>> thanks,
>>> Jon

>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Spce-user mailing list
>>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20160414/31c1ae30/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spce-user mailing list