[Spce-user] Route One Phone Number (CN or DID)

Thu Apr 19 10:04:20 EDT 2018

Hi!,

I had the same question (but with caller pattern), and I had applied the 
regex that you say and works fine, but if I add another rule with other 
caller pattern it don't works. How can I add two negative rules? I have 
spce 4.5.6.

The rules that i have created are this:

Calle prefix: 34902
Caller pattern: ^sips?:(?!(34123456789)).+$

Calle prefix: 34902
Caller pattern: ^sips?:(?!(34987654321)).+$

Thanks a lot!

Saludos,
Robert Cuaresma

El 16/04/2018 a las 9:38, Hohl Matthias escribió:
>
> Yes, this is normal beavior.
>
> Read this 6.6.2.3 => 
> https://www.sipwise.org/doc/mr5.5.3/spce/ar01s06.html#_creating_peerings
>
> If you on version 5.x.x use negative lookahead to disallow this number 
> on your higher priority peering, so it will fallback to your lower 
> priority peering.
>
> Callee Prefix: .
>
> Callee Pattern: ^sips?:(?!(431234567)).+$
>
> Caller Pattern: .
>
> This means: allow every Callee number expect of 431234567 from every 
> subscriber.
>
> *Von:*Spce-user <spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com> *Im Auftrag von 
> *Matt Schwinn
> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 15. April 2018 19:49
> *An:* Daniel Grotti <dgrotti at sipwise.com>
> *Cc:* spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> *Betreff:* Re: [Spce-user] Route One Phone Number (CN or DID)
>
> I have finally gotten around to testing this and I believe this is 
> incorrect, however I am using the caller pattern in this instance.  If 
> I have the peer set at priority 9, then the pattern never matches.  I 
> can only get it to match if I change the priority to 1 (higher than my 
> other peers).  Can someone verify?
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Daniel Grotti <dgrotti at sipwise.com 
> <mailto:dgrotti at sipwise.com>> wrote:
>
>     Priority does not matter, cause callee prefix match will win as
>     best match to the callee number.
>
>
>     -- 
>
>     Daniel Grotti
>
>     Head of Customer Support
>
>     Sipwise GmbH, Campus 21/Europaring F15
>
>     AT-2345 Brunn am Gebirge
>
>     Office: +43(0)130120332
>
>     Email:dgrotti at sipwise.com <mailto:dgrotti at sipwise.com>
>
>     Website:https://www.sipwise.com
>
>     On 03/01/2018 07:27 PM, Matt Schwinn wrote:
>
>         Ok excellent. Will this simply work, or does the peering group
>         need to be higher priority than my default?  Currently the
>         peer I would like it to go out is priority 2.  Also, how would
>         I specify several Callee numbers?  Comma separated?
>
>         Thank you again!
>
>         On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:18 AM, Daniel Grotti
>         <dgrotti at sipwise.com <mailto:dgrotti at sipwise.com>> wrote:
>
>             Hi,
>             then specify the Callee number in teh peering rule of
>             peering group you want to engage.
>
>             Cheers,
>
>             -- 
>
>             Daniel Grotti
>
>             Head of Customer Support
>
>             Sipwise GmbH, Campus 21/Europaring F15
>
>             AT-2345 Brunn am Gebirge
>
>             Office: +43(0)130120332
>
>             Email: dgrotti at sipwise.com <mailto:dgrotti at sipwise.com>
>
>             Website: https://www.sipwise.com
>
>             On 03/01/2018 06:14 PM, Matt Schwinn wrote:
>
>                 Callee... from one of my callers.
>
>                 On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Daniel Grotti
>                 <dgrotti at sipwise.com <mailto:dgrotti at sipwise.com>> wrote:
>
>                     Hi,
>
>                     Which number is rejected? Caller number or callee
>                     number?
>
>                     Daniel
>
>                     Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>                     On 01.03.2018, at 00:41, Matt Schwinn
>                     <winwithschwinn at gmail.com
>                     <mailto:winwithschwinn at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>                         My main provider is rejecting a phone number
>                         that another provider is not.  I'd like to
>                         route the one number to my secondary provider.
>                         What is the best way for me to do this?  I
>                         have some ideas, but I'd like advice from
>                         someone who has done this before. Thanks all!
>
>
>                         -- 
>
>                         Enjoy the day!
>                         Matt Schwinn
>                         TCG Technologies LLC
>
>                         and
>
>                         Company B
>
>                         209-202-3329
>
>                         www.TCGTechLLC.com <http://www.TCGTechLLC.com>
>
>                         _______________________________________________
>                         Spce-user mailing list
>                         Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>                         <mailto:Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com>
>                         https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>
>
>
>
>                 -- 
>
>                 Enjoy the day!
>                 Matt Schwinn
>                 TCG Technologies LLC
>
>                 and
>
>                 Company B
>
>                 209-202-3329
>
>                 www.TCGTechLLC.com <http://www.TCGTechLLC.com>
>
>
>
>
>         -- 
>
>         Enjoy the day!
>         Matt Schwinn
>         TCG Technologies LLC
>
>         and
>
>         Company B
>
>         209-202-3329
>
>         www.TCGTechLLC.com <http://www.TCGTechLLC.com>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Enjoy the day!
> Matt Schwinn
> TCG Technologies LLC
>
>       and
>
> Company B
>
> 209-202-3329
>
> www.TCGTechLLC.com <http://www.TCGTechLLC.com>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spce-user mailing list
> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20180419/9db4f0e8/attachment-0001.html>