[Spce-user] Route One Phone Number (CN or DID)
Robert Cuaresma
rcuaresma at telcon.es
Tue Apr 24 03:39:26 EDT 2018
Hi!
¿Anyone knows how to create a peering rule with two or more negative
patterns? Actually I have 2 rules created but doesn't works because all
calls go through first rule.
Thanks!
Saludos,
Robert Cuaresma
El 19/04/2018 a las 16:04, Robert Cuaresma escribió:
>
>
> Este remitente no superó nuestras comprobaciones de detección de fraude y es posible que no sea quien parece ser. Obtenga información acerca de la
> suplantación de identidad <http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing>.
> Comentarios <http://aka.ms/SafetyTipsFeedback>
>
> Hi!,
>
> I had the same question (but with caller pattern), and I had applied
> the regex that you say and works fine, but if I add another rule with
> other caller pattern it don't works. How can I add two negative rules?
> I have spce 4.5.6.
>
> The rules that i have created are this:
>
> Calle prefix: 34902
> Caller pattern: ^sips?:(?!(34123456789)).+$
>
> Calle prefix: 34902
> Caller pattern: ^sips?:(?!(34987654321)).+$
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Saludos,
> Robert Cuaresma
>
> El 16/04/2018 a las 9:38, Hohl Matthias escribió:
>>
>> Yes, this is normal beavior.
>>
>> Read this 6.6.2.3 =>
>> https://www.sipwise.org/doc/mr5.5.3/spce/ar01s06.html#_creating_peerings
>>
>> If you on version 5.x.x use negative lookahead to disallow this
>> number on your higher priority peering, so it will fallback to your
>> lower priority peering.
>>
>> Callee Prefix: .
>>
>> Callee Pattern: ^sips?:(?!(431234567)).+$
>>
>> Caller Pattern: .
>>
>> This means: allow every Callee number expect of 431234567 from every
>> subscriber.
>>
>> *Von:*Spce-user <spce-user-bounces at lists.sipwise.com> *Im Auftrag von
>> *Matt Schwinn
>> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 15. April 2018 19:49
>> *An:* Daniel Grotti <dgrotti at sipwise.com>
>> *Cc:* spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>> *Betreff:* Re: [Spce-user] Route One Phone Number (CN or DID)
>>
>> I have finally gotten around to testing this and I believe this is
>> incorrect, however I am using the caller pattern in this instance.
>> If I have the peer set at priority 9, then the pattern never
>> matches. I can only get it to match if I change the priority to 1
>> (higher than my other peers). Can someone verify?
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Daniel Grotti <dgrotti at sipwise.com
>> <mailto:dgrotti at sipwise.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Priority does not matter, cause callee prefix match will win as
>> best match to the callee number.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Daniel Grotti
>>
>> Head of Customer Support
>>
>> Sipwise GmbH, Campus 21/Europaring F15
>>
>> AT-2345 Brunn am Gebirge
>>
>> Office: +43(0)130120332
>>
>> Email:dgrotti at sipwise.com <mailto:dgrotti at sipwise.com>
>>
>> Website:https://www.sipwise.com
>>
>> On 03/01/2018 07:27 PM, Matt Schwinn wrote:
>>
>> Ok excellent. Will this simply work, or does the peering
>> group need to be higher priority than my default? Currently
>> the peer I would like it to go out is priority 2. Also, how
>> would I specify several Callee numbers? Comma separated?
>>
>> Thank you again!
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:18 AM, Daniel Grotti
>> <dgrotti at sipwise.com <mailto:dgrotti at sipwise.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> then specify the Callee number in teh peering rule of
>> peering group you want to engage.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --
>>
>> Daniel Grotti
>>
>> Head of Customer Support
>>
>> Sipwise GmbH, Campus 21/Europaring F15
>>
>> AT-2345 Brunn am Gebirge
>>
>> Office: +43(0)130120332
>>
>> Email: dgrotti at sipwise.com <mailto:dgrotti at sipwise.com>
>>
>> Website: https://www.sipwise.com
>>
>> On 03/01/2018 06:14 PM, Matt Schwinn wrote:
>>
>> Callee... from one of my callers.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Daniel Grotti
>> <dgrotti at sipwise.com <mailto:dgrotti at sipwise.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Which number is rejected? Caller number or callee
>> number?
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> On 01.03.2018, at 00:41, Matt Schwinn
>> <winwithschwinn at gmail.com
>> <mailto:winwithschwinn at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> My main provider is rejecting a phone number
>> that another provider is not. I'd like to
>> route the one number to my secondary
>> provider. What is the best way for me to do
>> this? I have some ideas, but I'd like advice
>> from someone who has done this before. Thanks
>> all!
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Enjoy the day!
>> Matt Schwinn
>> TCG Technologies LLC
>>
>> and
>>
>> Company B
>>
>> 209-202-3329
>>
>> www.TCGTechLLC.com <http://www.TCGTechLLC.com>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spce-user mailing list
>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>> <mailto:Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com>
>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Enjoy the day!
>> Matt Schwinn
>> TCG Technologies LLC
>>
>> and
>>
>> Company B
>>
>> 209-202-3329
>>
>> www.TCGTechLLC.com <http://www.TCGTechLLC.com>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Enjoy the day!
>> Matt Schwinn
>> TCG Technologies LLC
>>
>> and
>>
>> Company B
>>
>> 209-202-3329
>>
>> www.TCGTechLLC.com <http://www.TCGTechLLC.com>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Enjoy the day!
>> Matt Schwinn
>> TCG Technologies LLC
>>
>> and
>>
>> Company B
>>
>> 209-202-3329
>>
>> www.TCGTechLLC.com <http://www.TCGTechLLC.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spce-user mailing list
>> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
>> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spce-user mailing list
> Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20180424/1b8b7889/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Spce-user
mailing list