[Spce-user] Bye not passed down

[qabane me]

Hi
I have sent this privately.

On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 11:19 AM Daniel Grotti <dgrotti at sipwise.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> Would be easier to see the trace or the kamailio proxy/lb log.
> Tag must be the same as they define the dialog.
> Another common issue with BYE (or ACK) is the RURI which doesn’t no
> contain the contact value received in the initial INVITE or 200 OK.
>
> Hard to say without a trace.
>
> Danie
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 01.09.2018, at 02:02, qabane me <qabaneitsolutions at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > We have an issue with one of our interconnects where they send a bye and
> sipwise does not process it. I have pinned this down to this carrier
> changing the From-tag - the tag in the bye is not the same as in our invite.
> >
> > Am I correct in saying that this is wrong? And that this would indeed
> cause the bye not to be processed?
> >
> > While I will report this to them, there is a fair chance that they will
> not do anything about it. When using freeswitch, I don't have an issue and
> the bye is processed. Is there a parameter somewhere that would make
> kamailio ignore the fact that the from-tag is wrong (assuming that indeed
> one is not allowed to change this in a dialogue, which is my understanding).
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spce-user mailing list
> > Spce-user at lists.sipwise.com
> > https://lists.sipwise.com/listinfo/spce-user
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user_lists.sipwise.com/attachments/20180901/cce1d126/attachment-0001.html>